Resultados intrahospitalarios tras tratamiento percutáneo frente a quirúrgico en pacientes con estenosis aórtica y enfermedad arterial coronaria concomitante / In-hospital outcomes following percutaneous versus surgical intervention in the treatment of aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease

Introducción y objetivos: La enfermedad coronaria (EC) es frecuente en pacientes con estenosis aórtica; sin embargo, la estrategia terapéutica óptima sigue siendo objeto de debate. Investigamos los resultados periprocedimiento en pacientes sometidos a implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica con intervención coronaria percutánea (TAVI/ICP) frente al recambio valvular aórtico con injerto de derivación de arteria coronaria (RVAo/CABG) en pacientes con estenosis aórtica con EC.Métodos: Con los datos de alta del Sistema Nacional de Salud Español, se identificaron 6.194 pacientes (5.217 RVAo/CABG y 977 TAVI/ICP) entre 2016 y 2019. Se realizó un análisis emparejado por puntuación de propensión ajustado por características basales. El objetivo primario fue la mortalidad hospitalaria, Los objetivos secundarios fueron las complicaciones hospitalarias y rehospitalización cardiovascular a 30 días.Resultados: Tras el emparejamiento, se seleccionaron 774 parejas de pacientes. La mortalidad total hospitalaria fue más frecuente en el grupo quirúrgico (3,4 frente a 9,4%, p <0,001), al igual que el ictus periprocedimiento (0,9 frente a 2,2%, p=0,004), fallo renal agudo (4,3 frente a 16,0%, p <0,002), transfusión (9,6 frente a 21,1%, p <0,001) y neumonía intrahospitalaria (0,1 frente a 1,7%, p=0,001). La implantación de marcapasos permanente fue más frecuente en el tratamiento percutáneo (12,0 frente a 5,7%, p <0,001). Los centros de menor volumen (< 130 procedimientos por año) tuvieron mayor mortalidad hospitalaria para ambos procedimientos: TAVI/ICP (3,6 frente a 2,9%, p <0,001) y RVAo/CABG (9,3 frente a 6,8%, p <0,001). La rehospitalización cardiovascular a 30 días no difirió entre los grupos.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent among aortic stenosis patients; however the optimal therapeutic strategy remains debated. We investigated periprocedural outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with percutaneous coronary intervention (TAVI/PCI) vs surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting (SAVR/CABG) for aortic stenosis with CAD.Methods: Using discharge data from the Spanish National Health System, we identified 6194 patients (5217 SAVR/CABG and 977 TAVI/PCI) between 2016 and 2019. Propensity score matching was adjusted for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications and 30-day cardiovascular readmission.Results: Matching resulted in 774 pairs. In-hospital all-cause mortality was more common in the SAVR/CABG group (3.4% vs 9.4%, P <.001) as was periprocedural stroke (0.9% vs 2.2%; P=.004), acute kidney injury (4.3% vs 16.0%, P <.001), blood transfusion (9.6% vs 21.1%, P <.001), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (0.1% vs 1.7%, P=.001). Permanent pacemaker implantation was higher for matched TAVI/PCI (12.0% vs 5.7%, P <.001). Lower volume centers (< 130 procedures/y) had higher in-hospital all-cause mortality for both procedures: TAVI/PCI (3.6% vs 2.9%, P <.001) and SAVR/CABG (8.3 vs 6.8%, P <.001). Thirty-day cardiovascular readmission did not differ between groups.Conclusions: In this large contemporary nationwide study, percutaneous management of aortic stenosis and CAD with TAVI/PCI had lower in-hospital mortality and morbidity than surgical intervention. Higher volume centers had less in-hospital mortality in both groups. Dedicated national high-volume heart centers warrant further investigation.(AU)

In-hospital outcomes following percutaneous versus surgical intervention in the treatment of aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent among aortic stenosis patients; however the optimal therapeutic strategy remains debated. We investigated periprocedural outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with percutaneous coronary intervention (TAVI/PCI) vs surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting (SAVR/CABG) for aortic stenosis with CAD. METHODS: Using discharge data from the Spanish National Health System, we identified 6194 patients (5217 SAVR/CABG and 977 TAVI/PCI) between 2016 and 2019. Propensity score matching was adjusted for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications and 30-day cardiovascular readmission. RESULTS: Matching resulted in 774 pairs. In-hospital all-cause mortality was more common in the SAVR/CABG group (3.4% vs 9.4%, P <.001) as was periprocedural stroke (0.9% vs 2.2%; P=.004), acute kidney injury (4.3% vs 16.0%, P <.001), blood transfusion (9.6% vs 21.1%, P <.001), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (0.1% vs 1.7%, P=.001). Permanent pacemaker implantation was higher for matched TAVI/PCI (12.0% vs 5.7%, P <.001). Lower volume centers (< 130 procedures/y) had higher in-hospital all-cause mortality for both procedures: TAVI/PCI (3.6% vs 2.9%, P <.001) and SAVR/CABG (8.3 vs 6.8%, P <.001). Thirty-day cardiovascular readmission did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary nationwide study, percutaneous management of aortic stenosis and CAD with TAVI/PCI had lower in-hospital mortality and morbidity than surgical intervention. Higher volume centers had less in-hospital mortality in both groups. Dedicated national high-volume heart centers warrant further investigation.

Coronary artery bypass grafting in Spain. Influence of procedural volume on outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the association between volume and outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: We analyzed CABG episodes from 2013 to 2015. The selected outcome variables were in-hospital mortality in the index episode, 30-day cardiac-related readmissions, and mortality during readmission. Risk-adjusted rates of in-hospital mortality (RAMR) and 30-day readmissions (RARR) were calculated using multilevel logistic regression. High- and low-volume hospitals for CABG were identified by a nonconditioned analysis (k-means) and by compliance with the volume recommendation of clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 17 335 CABG index episodes were included, with a crude in-hospital mortality rate of 5.0%. Episodes attended in low-volume centers for CABG (< 155 CABG per year) showed 17% higher RAMR (5.81%±2.07% vs 4.96%±1.76%; P <.001) and a negative linear correlation between volume and RARR (r=-0.318; P=.029), as well as a higher percentage of complications during the episode. The same association between volume and more favorable outcomes was found in isolated CABG. CONCLUSIONS: The mean CABG volume is low in Spanish National Health System hospitals. Higher volume was associated with better outcomes in CABG, both total and isolated. The findings of this study indicate the need for a higher concentration of CABG programs, as well as the publication of risk-adjusted outcomes of coronary intervention.

The Value of the SYNTAX Score II in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The predictive value of the SYNTAX score (SS) for clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is very limited and could potentially be improved by the combination of anatomic and clinical variables, the SS-II. We aimed to evaluate the value of the SS-II in predicting outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: A total of 402 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI were included. Preprocedural TAVI angiograms were reviewed and the SS-I and SS-II were calculated using the SS algorithms. Patients were stratified in 3 groups according to SS-II tertiles. The coprimary endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, cerebrovascular event, or myocardial infarction at 1 year. RESULTS: Increased SS-II was associated with higher 30-day mortality (P=.036) and major bleeding (P=.015). The 1-year risk of death and MACE was higher among patients in the 3rd SS-II tertile (HR, 2.60; P=.002 and HR, 2.66; P<.001) and was similar among patients in the 2nd tertile (HR, 1.27; P=.507 and HR, 1.05; P=.895) compared with patients in the 1st tertile. The highest SS-II tertile was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (P=.046) and MACE (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: The SS-II seems more suited to predict clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI than the SS-I. Increased SS-II was associated with poorer clinical outcomes at 1 and 4 years post-TAVI, independently of the presence of coronary artery disease.